Thoughts on Jebel al-Lawz as the Location of Mount Sinai

Tags: , , , , ,

There has been much publicity in recent years concerning the identification of Jebel al-Lawz as Mt. Sinai. Although this idea is not new, it has been given new life by two adventurers, Robert Cornuke and Larry Williams. Although present knowledge does not allow us to pinpoint the exact position of Mt. Sinai, we can ascertain its general location from data given in the Bible. The Bible tells us exactly how long it took the Israelites to travel from Mt. Sinai to Kadesh Barnea. Knowing their approximate rate of travel provides a rough calculation of the distance traveled. This places Mt. Sinai in the general area of the northern Sinai Peninsula, not in Saudi Arabia. Scholars have paid scant attention to this important information in their efforts to locate Mt. Sinai.

 

Sinai Map 

 Map of the route of the Exodus according to Dr. Menashe Har-El,
professor of Historical and Biblical Geography, Tel Aviv University.

Individuals traveling in the Sinai on camelback average about 20 miles per day, or a little less (Davies 1979: 95-96). Donkey and camel caravans can average between 16 and 23 miles per day (Davies 1979: 96; cf. Beitzel 1985: 91), depending upon the terrain. Early in the 15th century BC, the Egyptian army under the leadership of Tuthmosis III averaged a commendable 15 miles per day in traversing the relatively easy coastal route from the eastern border of Egypt to Gaza (Wilson 1969: 235, n. 16). Once they left Gaza, however, and began to negotiate the rugged terrain of central Canaan, their rate decreased to 7 miles per day (Wilson 1969: 235, n. 18).

We have another record of a long journey made by a large number of people in Biblical times. This was the trip made from Babylon to Jerusalem by Ezra and a group of Jews returning from Exile. They left Babylon on the 12th day of the first month (Ezr 8:31) and arrived in Jerusalem on the first day of the fifth month (Ezr 7:9). The total elapsed time for the expedition was thus 121 days less 11, or 110 days. Allowing 15 days for Sabbath rest gives 95 travel days. The total distance covered was ca. 900 miles (The NlV Study Bible, note on Ezra 7:7-9), resulting in an average of 9.5 miles per day. Ezra and his company were following a well-traveled route without flocks and herds and thus were able to achieve a respectable rate of travel.

A large group of pastoralists moving with their possessions and animals can cover no more than 6 miles in a day, and usually less (Conder 1883: 79; cf. Beitzel 1985: 91). The limiting factor is the animals. When the Israelites left Egypt, they had "large droves of livestock, both flocks and herds" (Ex 13:38). Adequate sources of water had to be sought for them along the way and time had to be taken to allow the flocks and herds to graze as they traveled.

A crucial Biblical text for locating Mt. Sinai is Deuteronomy 1:2. Here it states that it took 11 days for the Israelites to travel from Horeb (Mt. Sinai) to Kadesh Barnea in the northern Sinai. This limits the location of Mt. Sinai to 60 or so miles from Kadesh Barnea. The straight-line distance from Jebel al-Lawz to Kadesh Barnea is approximately 150 miles. Allowing for diversions to find water, twists and turns, and ups and downs, the walking distance would be much greater. This is much too far for the Israelites to travel in 11 days.

Even more devastating to the Saudi Arabia theory is the yam suph (Reed Sea) crossing. According to the Bible it occurred at the beginning of the journey shortly after the Israelites set out from Ramesses (Ex 12:37; 13:20-14:2; Nm 33:5-8). The Saudi Arabia theory places the yam suph crossing near the end of the journey at the Strait of Tiran at the southern end of the Gulf of Aqaba, some 350 map miles from Ramesses. There is no way the Israelites could have reached the Strait of Tiran within a few weeks after having left Egypt.

The traditional site of Jebel Musa cannot be Mt. Sinai either. The distance from Jebel Musa to Kadesh Barnea is about 160 map miles, again much too far for the Israelites to trek in 11 days.

Utilizing the travel time of the Israelites as an estimate of the distance traveled, the location of Mt. Sinai should be sought in the northern area of the Sinai Peninsula, roughly 60 miles from Kadesh Barnea.

Recommended Resources for Further Study

     
Bible and Spade
CD-ROM
Archaeology and
the Old Testament
Moses and
the Gods of Egypt


Bibliography

Beitzel, B.J.
1985 The Moody Atlas of Bible Lands. Chicago: Moody.

Conder, C.R.
1883 The Exodus. Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly Statement 1883: 79-90.

Davies, G.I.
1979 The Significance of Deuteronomy 1.2 for the Location of Mount Horeb. Palestine Exploration Quarterly 111: 87-101.

Wilson, J.A.
1969 Egyptian Historical Texts. Pp. 227-64 in Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, 3rd ed., ed. J.B. Pritchard. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press

Related Articles
Comments

From the map it is obvious that both proposed mountain locations are equadistant from Kadesh Barnea. Yet you offer no proof of your location of Kadeah Barnea, which is a critical component of your logic. Also, you are picking and choosing which of the "miraculous" elements to discount, so that it fits your logic scheme. If you are going to accept that there was a Red Sea crossing at all, then you must also accept that the cloud by day and fire by night "leading them" would have some effect upon their rate of travel.

John - 8/24/2008 4:36:37 PM

Dear John, Re: 8/24/08 post

Thanks for commenting on our website. We appreciate your interest.

Perusing through Dr. Wood's brief article, we see know rejection of the supernatural acts of God, nor His superintendence over the events connected to the Exodus. The cloud by day and fire by night certainly happened, but we fail to see how these phenomenon could have substantially increased the ability to move through the Sinai with women, children, elders and animals, not to mention finding water along the way. It certainly would not provide enough time to travel from Kadesh Barnea to Jebel Al-Lawz in Saudi Arabia in 11 days.

Additionally, the location of Kadesh Barnea is well-established through historical and archaeological records. The onus is on the proponent of the Saudi Arabia theory to demonstrate: 1. The currently accepted location is incorrect and why. 2. A new proposed location with evidence to back it up.

We refer our visitors to other in depth articles that further show that the Saudia Arabia theory is untenable and should be rejected.

www.biblearchaeology.org/.../...-Saudi-Arabia.aspx

www.biblearchaeology.org/.../...-Saudi-Arabia.aspx

www.biblearchaeology.org/.../...h-of-Mt-Sinai.aspx

We hope this is helpful in your research.

Henry Smith

hsmith - 8/25/2008 6:51:51 PM

Add a comment
 
Please note that comments and questions submitted to the ABR Web site are subject to staff review prior to being published on the Web site. We encourage open and intelligent discussion, even when the view differs from our own. We do reserve the right to remove comments containing inappropriate language or personal invectives. Please feel free to ask questions and a member of our staff will respond as time permits. - Thank you, and God bless.
Bible and Spade magazine Become a Member Make a Donation to ABR

Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

Investigating Origins: A recent series of genetic studies has revealed tantalizing hints of the origin of the human species....
Exodus-Conquest: The short answer to our title question is that the Mountain of God, Mt. Horeb, Mt. Sinai and Mt. Paran...
General Apologetics: The Bible is far more a history text than it is a science text, but I have never doubted that where it...
Associates for Biblical Research
PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
Phone: +1 717-859-3443 | Fax: +1 717-859-3393
Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008

©2008 Associates for Biblical Research.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy