Carbon 14 Dating at Jericho

Tags: ,

Initially, a C14 date of 1410 +/- 40 B.C. (done by the British Museum) was published for charcoal from the destruction level of Jericho (Jericho V [1983], p. 763).  This was later found to be in error and corrected from 3080 +/- 40 BP to 3300 +/- 110 BP (Radiocarbon 32 [1990]: 74; BP = before present), which calibrates to 1590 or 1527 +/- 110 B.C., depending on how one reads the calibration curve (Radiocarbon 35 [1993]: 30).  Additional tests were done on six grain samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 1640 and 1520 B.C. and 12 charcoal samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 1690 and 1610 B.C. (Radiocarbon 37 [1995]: 217).  More recently, the Italians obtained two samples from a structure at the base of the tell that yielded dates of 1347 +/-85 and 1597 +/-91 B.C. (Quaderni di Gerico 2 [2000]: 206–207, 330, 332).  The locus the samples were taken from appears to contain debris from the final Bronze Age destruction of the city.

My dating of the destruction of Jericho to ca. 1400 B.C. is based on pottery, which, in turn, is based on Egyptian chronology.  Jericho is just one example of the discrepancy between historical and C14 dates for the second millennium B.C.  C14 dates are consistently 100–150 years earlier than historical dates.  There is a heated debate going on among scholars concerning this, especially with regard to the date of the eruption of Thera (Santorini).  The literature on the subject is enormous, so I will not attempt to give you references.  A recent overview can be found in Manfred Bietak and Felix Höflmayer, Introduction: High and Low Chronology, pp. 13–23 in The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C. III, eds. Manfred Bietak and Ernst Czerny, Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2007.  Because of the inconsistencies and uncertainties of C14 dating, most archaeologists prefer historical dates over C14 dates.

Editorial note: The evidence for the destruction of Jericho at the time the Bible describes it and the way the Bible describes it is overwhelming. Dr. Wood has done extensive work on this subject. Articles pertaining to this all important Biblical subject can be found here on the ABR website:

The Walls of Jericho

Did the Israelites Conquer Jericho? A New Look at the Archaeological Evidence

Extra-Biblical Evidence for the Conquest

Recommended Resources for Further Study

     
Bible and Spade
CD-ROM

Second Great Battle
of Jericho DVD 

Giving the Sense

 

 

View this video clip of Dr. Wood discussing the evidence from Jericho.

Related Articles
Comments

Thank you Dr Wood for your article on C14 dating.

Best wishes in the Lord

Ian

Ian Bradley - 8/11/2008 10:33:56 PM

i have often wondered about the grain seeds and think that it is possible for them to have lain around for 100-200 years before the destrucion of the city. i do not think it is wise to assume that artifacts were produced or harvested right before the demise of a town or city.

there are too many possibilities of how certain artifacts and other items came to their place of rest before discovery centuries later, which render dating systems as unreliable to a certain extent.

i say that more in support for dr. wood's date not against it.

dr. david tee - 8/13/2008 10:39:23 PM

Add a comment
 
Please note that comments and questions submitted to the ABR Web site are subject to staff review prior to being published on the Web site. We encourage open and intelligent discussion, even when the view differs from our own. We do reserve the right to remove comments containing inappropriate language or personal invectives. Please feel free to ask questions and a member of our staff will respond as time permits. - Thank you, and God bless.
Bible and Spade magazine Become a Member Make a Donation to ABR

Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

Exodus-Conquest: The short answer to our title question is that the Mountain of God, Mt. Horeb, Mt. Sinai and Mt. Paran...
General Apologetics: The Bible is far more a history text than it is a science text, but I have never doubted that where it...
New Testament Era: Our understanding of the events surrounding the birth of Jesus are usually formed by our exposure to...
Associates for Biblical Research
PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
Phone: +1 717-859-3443 | Fax: +1 717-859-3393
Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008

©2008 Associates for Biblical Research.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy