Noah's Ark Update

Share/recommend this article:

Excerpt To date, the Ark has not yet been found. Several locations for it have been proposed: Mount Ararat in northeastern Turkey; Mount Cudi (Judi) in southeastern Turkey; the so-called Durupinar site near Mount Ararat; and several mountains in northern Iran, including Damavand, Sabalon, and Suleiman... Continue reading

Explore
Related Articles
Support
Like this artice?

Our Ministry relies on the generosity of people like you. Every small donation helps us develop and publish great articles.

Please support ABR!

Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover & PayPal

Recently, an ABR website visitor wrote the following question:

I am very keen to know where exactly Noah's ark was discovered. Can you elaborate more on the findings you conducted within the last couple of years? Please, I need more information.

ABR's Rick Lanser responds.

Dear Wesley,

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of ABR, and for turning to us for help with this intriguing question. I have been studying this topic for over a decade, and think I can give you some reliable information.

To date, the Ark has not yet been found. Several locations for it have been proposed: Mount Ararat in northeastern Turkey; Mount Cudi (Judi) in southeastern Turkey; the so-called Durupinar site near Mount Ararat; and several mountains in northern Iran, including Damavand, Sabalon, and Suleiman.

The three latter mountains have no eyewitness attestation or historical documentation I know of, are geographically outside of the "mountains of Arartu" area (Genesis 8:4), and have revealed nothing of interest in aerial or satellite studies. They are thus discounted by nearly all researchers. Additional information about these sites can be found at http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2006/07/Noahs-Ark-in-Iran.aspx and http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2007/02/Did-the-BASE-Institute-Discover-Noahs-Ark-in-Iran.aspx .

The Durupinar site advocated primarily by the late Ron Wyatt and his followers has been examined by qualified geologists and identified as being an unusual but still natural geological feature, within which no wood remains have been located. Details are available at http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i4/report.asp.

Of the remaining two locations, Mount Cudi has its advocates because there are historical records that appear to point to it; nothing solid has turned up on Mount Ararat; and it is within the Biblical area of Ararat/Urartu (although at the extreme southwestern limit). ABR staff member Gordon Franz and independent researcher Bill Crouse are among those favoring this site (their article is found in the online issue of Bible and Spade magazine, http://www.biblearchaeology.org/publications/BAS19_4.pdf).

However, from my own research (given in detail at http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2008/02/An-Armenian-Perspective-on-Noahs-Ark.aspx ), it appears all of the historical evidence for this location ultimately traces back to the Babylonian astrologer/historian Berossus, whose siting of the Ark in the Gordyaean Mountains (where Mount Cudi is) was based upon the local Babylonian flood myth centered around Xisuthros. The only field evidence so far adduced in support of it is some bitumen or charcoal, which may be from a number of possible sources. No clear eyewitness accounts of an Ark on this rather low (2089 meters - approximately 7000 feet) mountain directly to the north of Mesopotamia are known. Since Genesis 8:4-5 tells us that it took about 2 1/2 months for the tops of the mountains to become visible AFTER the Ark had come to rest, and there are much taller mountains than Mount Cudi in the region (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountains_in_Turkey), it is difficult to reconcile this Scripture with the Mount Cudi location. Geological problems also exist for Mount Cudi, indicating it did not exist at the time of the Flood (see http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2008/08/An-Alternative-Interpretation-of-Benders-Wood.aspx ).

The last serious candidate for the location of the Ark is Mount Ararat. More than 30 alleged eyewitnesses claim to have seen the Ark on this mountain, far more than any other site, and many from the 20th century. It is located well within the biblical "mountains of Ararat" area. Historical documentation for this site is not as strong as for Mount Cudi, but this has been attributed to the early Armenian church father Gregory the Illuminator purging almost all records tracing back to Armenia's pagan era. The earliest extant historical documentation of the Ark being on Ararat (called Masis by the Armenians) traces back to the 11th century. It is alleged by some that the general geology of the area precludes Mount Ararat having existed at the time of the Flood, but this remains unproven due to the political difficulty in getting direct access to Ararat itself to do field geology. The last detailed geology work actually done on the mountain seems to be that of Clifford Burdick in the 1960s; he concluded there were evidences that the core of Ararat indicated greater age than the volcanic rocks extruded later, but his findings are controversial and cannot be given too much weight.

In my estimation, the best candidate for the location of the Ark is Mount Ararat. But if so, where on Ararat? There is a great deal of coherence between a number of the independent testimonies of alleged eyewitnesses, giving us to believe that the Ark is located in a stationary glacier within a small canyon, surrounded by a "horseshoe" of small peaks, around the 14,000-15,000 foot elevation, above the Ahora Gorge on the northeast side of Mount Ararat. The reports indicate the glacier cover only melts out sufficiently to partly expose the Ark once in 20 years or so. Efforts continue to this day, using satellite technology as well as climbing teams, to locate the elusive Ark.

That is where things stand at this time. We invite you to pray that God will remove the political and spiritual hindrances and reveal the Ark to the world soon!

In His service,

Rick Lanser

Recommended Resources for Further Study

     
The Genesis
Record

 Explorers of Ararat

Paradise to Prison

 

Read more at these ABR links:

Gordon Franz returns from Mount Cudi Expedition

An Armenian Perspective on the Search for Noah's Ark

Did the BASE Institute Discover Noah’s Ark in Iran?

Noah's Ark in Iran? 

Mount Cudi: The True Mountain of Noah's Ark in the Fall 2006 Issue of Bible and Spade: View the PDF

The Case for Ararat in the Fall 2006 Issue of Bible and Spade: View the PDF

Mount Ararat Archaeological Survey published in the Summer 2008 issue of Bible and Spade.

Other articles pertaining to Noah's Ark and the Genesis Flood 

 

Please help ABR continue to post these free articles by making a donation of any size today. Donate

  

Comments Comment RSS

11/28/2008 6:04 PM #

I just looked at it in Genesis 8:4, And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.

that is mount ararat in NorthEast Turkey where was the Noah's Ark leave there but that is not mount cudi.  I believe it is on Mount Ararat.
that what the Bible says so!

Tribes of Judah - 11/28/2008 6:04:41 PM

5/6/2009 8:06 AM #

Mr. Lanser -

What do you believe are the "political and spiritual hindrances" preventing our discovery of the Ark?

If traces of a ship are eventually discovered on Mount Ararat, does that necessarily mean it belonged to Noah or that any of the other details of the story are true?

If God wanted to reveal evidence of himself or the truth of the Bible to the world, why would he do it in the 21st century by "allowing" archeologists to discover the remains of a ship in Turkey?

Johnny - 5/6/2009 8:06:43 AM

9/9/2009 5:56 AM #

I am learning about Noah's Ark in my PACE.  I found it interesting and decided to look up some pictures and found some on google.com  this very interesting. GOD iS awesome I really want to learn more about Noahs ark!!!!!

TeMera - 9/9/2009 5:56:35 AM

10/27/2009 6:24 AM #

So the Himalayas have risen *at least* 14,000 feet since the Noachian flood? Where is the evidence for this gigantic growth? Where are the ancient Indo-Chinense documents that record this remarkable event?

R Hampton - 10/27/2009 6:24:07 AM

11/2/2009 4:29 AM #

I just wondered.
Is there any news (update) with respect to Randall Price's expedition to Aararat this summer?

Rob Lichtendahl - 11/2/2009 4:29:11 AM

1/22/2010 6:44 AM #

im a little confused the bible clearly says the ark rested on the mountains of mount ararat how in the world do all these other locations especially in other countries come up, besides havent all the eye witness accounts come from mount ararat?

michele - 1/22/2010 6:44:47 AM

3/13/2010 7:44 PM #

The Ark could have been moved by way of ice or water.  If on a high mountain.  I'm not a scientist, however, there are ways for its current location to not line up with what is in the bible.  That in no way makes the Bible wrong.  At the time of the resting of the ark, it was located on Mt. Ararat.  However, people change, times change, names change....who knows.  A glacier could have pushed the Ark somewhere unexpected.

Janet - 3/13/2010 7:44:21 PM

5/4/2010 9:33 AM #

Mt Ararat between Mt Kucuk Agrai from 4000 to 2500 where The ark may rest.

Peter Dehne - 5/4/2010 9:33:10 AM

Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

Psalm 119 is an anonymous Psalm which stands alone between two separate groupings of chapters. After...
Dear ABR Friends, Our fiscal year calendar closed on June 30th and we look back with deep appreciation...
For many years, Jericho has been a "problem" in Biblical archaeology since scholars claimed that there...
Because the Shroud of Turin has received much public attention in the news, on television and on the...
Associates for Biblical Research
  • PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
  • Phone: +1 717-859-3443 | Fax: +1 717-859-3393
  • Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008
Friend ABR on Facebook.com Join us on Twitter Join us on Twitter