Tall el-Hammam 2008: A Personal Perspective

Share/recommend this article:

Excerpt In January 2009, we will be back in the field for our fourth season of excavating at Tall el-Hammam, Jordan. Situated seven miles north of the Dead and nine miles east of the Jordan River, it is the largest site in the southern Jordan River Valley... Continue reading

Explore
Related Articles
Support
Like this artice?

Our Ministry relies on the generosity of people like you. Every small donation helps us develop and publish great articles.

Please support ABR!

Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover & PayPal

In January 2009, we will be back in the field for our fourth season of excavating at Tall el-Hammam1, Jordan. Situated seven miles north of the Dead Sea and nine miles east of the Jordan River, it is the largest site in the southern Jordan River Valley. Surface surveys and archaeological excavations suggest that activity at the site began with the earliest Biblical references to the region and continued intermittently right through New Testament times. Tall el-Hammam is rich with remains from almost every period. While I will have more to tell after we return and have an opportunity to analyze our finds from this season, as I leave for Jordan I wanted to share what we presently know about the site down through history, especially as it relates to the Bible. 

One of the most important things that happened during the 2008 dig season was the completion of a joint agreement with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. While we already have an excavation permit from the Kingdom’s Department of Antiquities (DoA), we now have officially entered into a whole new level of relationship with the department. The Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project (TeHEP) is now a cooperative effort between the College of Archaeology, Trinity Southwest University and the Department of Antiquities of Jordan. This partnership allows for our excavation team to work hand-in-hand with our Jordanian counterparts both in the field during the excavation season as well as in the research lab the rest of the year. Their expertise will provide great insight and support to our research. 

Map of the southern Jordan River Valley, the area known as the kikkar (“the plain of the Jordan” – Gn 13:10) in the Hebrew Bible. Tall el-Hammam is number 8 on the map, a site which many scholars have suggested was Abel Shittim in the time of Moses and the TeHEP thesis is that the site might have been Sodom in Abraham’s time). Note that the sites on the east side are a good distance from the Jordan River and close to the Jordan mountain range, east of the Jordan River Valley – suggesting a river flooding problem and the ancient roadway circling wide along the edge of eastern mountains. It would have been from these mountains that Balaam looked down on the Israelites and tried to curse them (Nu 22-24) and it was to these mountains that Moses ascended up to Mount Nebo and died (Dt 34). Credit: Trinity Southwest Seminary

The Early Bronze Age:  Tall el-Hammam and the Table of Nations 

The earliest city was centered on the lower tall (tel in Hebrew [Jos 11:13] and tell or tall in Arabic; an artificial mound created by the building, destruction and rebuilding of cities at the same location) and pottery we collected here suggests that occupation goes back well before 3,000 BC.  It appears the site was continuously occupied from the Chalcolithic Period through the Middle Bronze Age. 

The working hypothesis of the Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project is that our site is the best candidate for the Biblical city of Sodom. That would make the lower tall the city mentioned in Genesis 10 (the Table of Nations). This chapter describes the post-Flood population as it spread throughout the ancient Near East, listing a number of cities by name. It says that descendants of Ham built four cities in ancient southern Mesopotamia (Babel, Erech, Accad and Calneh), four cities in northern Mesopotamia (Nineveh, Rehoboth, Calah and Resen), three cities on the western border of Canaan (Sidon, Gerar, Gaza), and five cities on Canaan’s eastern border (Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboim and Lasha).

Scholars generally believe the Bible locates Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboim (called cities of the plain/kikkar of the Jordan – Gn 13:10) on the eastern side of the Jordan River and Dead Sea. That would also locate the eastern border of Canaan and the Canaanite culture there (Gn 19:10). While rivers regularly served as ancient national borders, the Jordan River appears not to have been the eastern boundary of Canaanite culture throughout many of the Biblical periods. Apparently an even greater boundary in the area was the high Jordanian mountains. Getting up and down those mountain slopes was even more difficult than fording the Jordan River. Similarities in the archaeological evidence from both sides of the Jordan River Valley support such a cultural boundary. Pottery from the Early Bronze Age at Tall el-Hammam connects most closely to pottery at early sites west of the Jordan River. 

Consequently, our lower tall would represent the Sodom whose wickedness brought God’s judgment by the time of Abraham (Gn 13:13; 18:20). Based on architectural and ceramic evidence we found this season, it appears this oldest city was actually twice as large as we thought before the season began. The lower tall (over 40 acres) was surrounded by a four-meter wide city wall with towers. A continuation of the wall’s stone foundation was traced this year around the base of the upper tall (another 40 acres) as well. That would make Early Bronze Age Tall el-Hammam about a kilometer long from east to west, with a circumference of three to four kilometers – one of the largest cities at that time in all the ancient Near East.

Whole storage jar from 8th-7th centuries BC, found just a foot below the modern surface of the tall. It came from the remains of a typical house of that time period. 

In connection with this Early Bronze city at Tall el-Hammam, and about 200 yards east of the site, is a massive dolmen field on the edge of the foothills. Dolmens are ancient miniature “Stonehenge”-type structures. Each one was constructed with upright megalithic stones serving as the four walls and flat top, 7 x 7 x 7 feet on average. While scholars are not really certain how they were used, the lack of both pottery and bones seems to suggest they were neither houses nor tombs. Instead, they may have served a cultic or ceremonial purpose, each one possibly representing an extended family. Dating as far back as the beginning of the Early Bronze Age (3000 BC), they may have served as a sort of family shrine or funerary monument for the departed. 

Called the Ar Rawda Dolmen Field, with over 100 extant dolmens, the area is being threatened by development. So, TeHEP is fortunate to have a couple of contemporary studies being done on this dolmen field connected to our site. An international project is conducting an ongoing spatial analysis of the dolmen field while a comprehensive survey to identify and record all the dolmens in the area has been undertaken by Hussein al-Jarrah on behalf of the Jordanian Department of Antiquities. Hussein is also the DoA director of the region where Tall el-Hammam is located, and he works side by side with us when we are excavating as a member of the TeHEP staff. 

The Middle Bronze Age: Tall el-Hammam in the Days of Abraham and Lot

The Middle Bronze Age city, destroyed by fire, was centered on the 40-acre upper tall. In fact, the shape of the tall today is due to the construction of a mudbrick rampart which may extend from the top of the tall and down the slope all the way to that Early Bronze Age city wall at its base. On the upper tall we had already identified the rampart beneath Iron Age city structures in a number of squares. Its construction would have been a massive undertaking and evidence of both a strong government and a prosperous community.

Last season we were also able to trace the Middle Bronze Age stone city wall and a couple of towers around much of the western end of the lower tall. That, along with ceramic evidence in the lower city, suggests the Middle Bronze Age city also extended over that area as well. We will need to excavate in the lower tall to clarify these things; but either way, the massive rampart makes it clear that the central city at that time was focused on the upper tall.

Down twelve feet from the modern surface of Tall el-Hammam, the excavators reached a Middle Bronze Age house in a destruction layer, beneath 10 feet of Iron Age strata. Steven Collins, Director of the Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project (TeHEP), is in the foreground left, the author is in the rear on the right.  

On the upper tall a number of mudbrick walls have been found still partially standing, along with a massive amount of disintegrated mudbrick debris everywhere we dig.  In situ Middle Bronze Age pottery has been found in a couple of squares 12 feet below the present surface of the mound. When this city was finally destroyed, possibly in the days of Abraham and Lot (see Gn 19), it was after some 2,500 years of occupation. This level would be the one that we believe could be the Sodom of the Bible.

The Late Bronze Age: Tall el-Hammam in the Days of Moses

After destruction of the Middle Bronze city (sometime before 1600 BC), the whole site appears to have no city wall or permanent occupation for 500-700 years. During this same period, all the cities on the eastern Jordan plain (kikkar) appear to have the same hiatus in settlement. That was also the time period when the Israelites passed through this area – called at that time “the plains (araboth) of Moab” (Nu 22:1). Moab was one of the non-Canaanite cultures living in the Jordanian mountains. Their kingdom centered in the highlands between the Arnon River (modern Wadi Mujib) and the Zared River (modern Wadi Hasa) Rivers (Nu 21:13). God specified to the Israelites that they could not fight with or occupy Moabite land (Dt 2:9).

So, it is an interesting paradox that this land, about 20 miles north of the Arnon (Mujib), would be called the plains of Moab. Apparently, at some point during the occupational hiatus in the kikkar of the Jordan (from the Middle Bronze destruction to 1400 BC), the Moabite kingdom controlled this region and it is thus mentioned in the Exodus narrative as the plains (araboth) of Moab. Yet at the time of Moses, King Sihon of the Amorites, living in Heshbon, had captured this land that was formerly under Moabite control (as far south as the Arnon; Nu 21:26). The Israelites defeated Sihon in battle and took control of their lands (Nu 21:23-24), including this area.

The Israelites’ last camp east of the Jordan is mentioned at Abel Shittim (Nu 25:1; and vicinity Nu 33:49) in the plains (araboth) of Moab. The name Abel Shittim (“meadow of the shittah trees”) suggests an area where many of these trees grew in the midst of an arabah (“desert”), the Hebrew word from which we get Arab or “desert dweller.” The shittah tree (called acacia today) was used to construct both the tabernacle and its furniture at Mount Sinai (Ex 25-38). It grows in arid climates and fits both the term arabah and the southern Jordan Valley region. While I have not seen any acacia trees in the immediate area, Lieutenant W.E. Lynch of the United States Expedition to the Jordan River and the Dead Sea reported seeing them in this region in 1848. 

Abel Shittim does not sound like a city in the Bible, but more like an oasis. An oasis indicates a water source and the modern Arabic name Tall el-Hammam means the “mound of the hot spring.” Since the Biblical text puts Abel Shittim in the vicinity of Tall el-Hamman, as the largest tall in the whole region it is tempting to visualize Moses, Joshua, the Israelites and the Tabernacle all camping in the midst of the ruins of the upper and lower tells. For this very reason, and without any archaeological evidence, many scholars have assumed that Tall el-Hammam must have been the site of Abel Shittim (check the maps in the back of your Bible). From there Moses went east back up into the Jordanian highlands and died on Mount Nebo (Dt 34). Joshua, the Israelites and the Tabernacle went west to the Jordan River. To this point in our excavations, we do not have any evidence that the Israelites did stay here for a short period of time – but our extensive observations of the region suggest it was indeed the most logical place to camp.

It was while Israel was camped here that Baalam, the son of Beor, looked down on them from the Jordanian highlands and pronounced four blessings on them (Nu 22-24). Also, at Abel Shittim the Israelites fell into immorality associated with the worship of Baal Peor, apparently at Balaam’s prompting (Nu 31:16 – see also 2 Peter 2:15; Rev 2:14), and suffered God’s judgment (Nu 25:1-9) as a result. Balaam must have been an important religious figure in this region, because archaeologists found additional oracles of “Baalam the son of Beor” inscribed on limestone plaster at Deir Alla (dated to the 8th century BC), some 30 miles north of Tall el-Hammam. 

 

Three views of the Movenpick Resort and Spa Dead Sea, on the sea’s eastern shore looking across to the west shore.  This is the TeHEP headquarters while digging at Tall el-Hammam.

  
  
The Iron Age:  The Tall el-Hammam of Solomon and the Kingdom of Israel

At the time of the Conquest of Canaan, the tribes of Reuben, Gad and half of Manasseh requested and were allowed to occupy land on the east side of the Jordan River that belonged to the kingdoms of Og (king of Bashan) and Sihon (king of the Amorites). But they were expressly forbidden from occupying the property of the Edomites, Moabites or Ammonites (Nu 32). The border between the inheritance of Gad (north) and Reuben (south) passes right by Tall el-Hammam (Jos 13:15-28). At this point we are not able to clarify the precise border line or on which side our site was located. Either way, it was in the territory of Israelite occupation. Again, pottery from the excavation at Tall el-Hammam suggests a cultural connection to Canaan west of the Jordan River, and not the Jordanian highlands (Moabite or Ammonite).

After the occupational hiatus in the region during the first millennium BC, the upper tall of our site was again occupied. This was a major city with a wall three meter wide circling the top of the tall, sitting on the top of the mudbrick rampart of the Middle Bronze Age city. Many stone and mudbrick walls from the city of this time can be seen right on, and just beneath, the surface of the tall. Because the pottery does not suggest either a strong Ammonite or Moabite presence at Tall el-Hammam, it is interesting to wonder if the site was part of Solomon’s twelfth administrative district in Gilead (I Kgs 4:19), with Geber the son of Uri as the district administrator (in the former area of Sihon and Og). It was in this district that Solomon also had the bronze items of his Temple cast in clay molds on the plains of the Jordan (2 Chr 4:17). Is it possible that this district’s capital city was located at Tall el-Hamman, in eyesight of Jerusalem’s Mount of Olives?

Either way, archaeological evidence does indicate at least two destructions of this city during the Iron Age – either by earthquake or enemy. It is tempting to wonder if the same 8th century BC earthquake that destroyed Deir Alla (perhaps the earthquake of Amos 1:1 and Zech 14:4-5, the one probably responsible for the 8th century BC destructions at Hazor and Samaria) also caused the destruction at Tall el-Hammam. 

The Greco-Roman Period:  The Tall el-Hammam of the New Testament

Yet occupation at Tall el-Hammam continued after the Iron Age. To date it is not clear how things progressed at the site from the end of the Iron Age into the Hellenistic and Roman periods. In the early 1800’s, W.M. Thomson identified warm sulfur springs and ancient baths on the plain right next to where the upper and lower talls connect. This is the same area where we uncovered a significant structure from the Roman period this year. Many artifacts from both the Roman and Byzantine periods have been found there, including coins, pottery sherds and fragments of blown glass. Last season (2008) we also uncovered a Roman aqueduct just off the southeast edge of the site. It ran low along the ground (with about a 10 degree slope) for at least 180 yards, of which we have clarified some 100 yards. Since plowing banana fields and digging modern graves has revealed Roman and Byzantine mosaic floors over a mile to our southwest,  it appears a major Roman-era city was once located at the edge of our talls. This suggests the usual settlement pattern of Greco-Roman cities in Palestine – not resettling on the ancient talls, but building cities down below, near the water source – was also practiced at Tall-Hammam. Still, pottery and some walls on both the eastern and western ends of the upper tall indicate some level of occupation at this time.

In reality, the whole region was rich with activity in New Testament times. At basically the same place along the Jordan River that Joshua, the Israelites and the Ark of the Covenant crossed from east to west (Jos 4-5), Elijah and Elisha crossed from west to east (2 Kgs 2). Elijah left in a whirlwind for heaven from the east bank, while Elisha crossed back again. Here, too, was probably the location where John the Baptist, “in the spirit and power of Elijah” (Mt 11:14, 17:11-13; Lu 1:17), was baptizing in Bethany (Bethabara) beyond the Jordan. This was also the area where Jesus was baptized (Jn 1:28; 10:40).

A site called Abila was known in the southern Jordan Valley during Roman times. That name comes from the Old Testament name Abel Shittim (“meadow of the acacia trees”). With minimal excavation in the whole area to date, modern scholars suggest Abila might have been located at Tall Nimrin, near Tall el-Hammam. Wherever it was located, it represents the same basic name in the same basic place at a later time period.

In his last days, Herod the Great visited the hot springs at Kallirrhoe (‘Ayn az-Zara) just south of our hotel2 along the northeastern shore of the Dead Sea. Shortly afterward, he died at Jericho (within sight of Tall el-Hammam) and was buried, according to Josephus, at one of his palace/forts, Herodium (almost directly across the Dead Sea and clearly seen from our hotel).

View of the acropolis of Tall el-Hammam, looking southwest, with the sun shining off the waters of the Dead Sea seven miles away.  The central cut through the acropolis was done by Jordanian army bulldozers in the 1960’s, as they created tank emplacements facing the Jordan River Valley.

After Herod the Great’s death, his kingdom was divided and ruled by three of his sons. Son Herod Antipas ruled under Roman authority as tetrarch (Mt 14:1) of Galilee (Lu 3:1) and Perea. As the ruler of Galilee, Antipas ruled from Sepphoris and later Tiberias. Because of His connection to Nazareth in Galilee, Jesus was sent by Pilate to appear before Antipas on the day He was crucified (Lu 23:6-12). But Antipas is also well known for another infamous act in the other part of his kingdom, Perea. Here sat one of Herod the Great’s palace/fort complexes – Machaerus (Arabic Mukawir) on the edge of the Jordanian hills north of the Arnon (Mujib), with a beautiful view of the Dead Sea and within eyesight of Masada. Josephus (Antiquities 18.5.1-2) recorded that it was at Machaerus that Antipas imprisoned and beheaded John the Baptist (see Mt 14:1-3).

Antipas also fortified an older city, renamed it Livias (in honor of Julia Livia, wife of Emperor Augustus), and made it his own capital for Perea. Also known as Julias, the city was located in the general area of Tall el-Hammam (as attested by Josephus, Eusebius and Jerome). The 4th century AD pilgrim Egeria mentions looking down from Mount Nebo and seeing Livias north of the Dead Sea and all the land of the Sodomites to the left. The reference to a Bishop of Sodom attending the Second Council of Nicea makes it reasonable to suggest the connection of Tall el-Hammam with both Sodom and Livias. With minimal excavation in the region, scholars generally place Livias at either nearby Tall Nimrim or Tall Rama, but initial finds at Tall el-Hammam suggest it, too, must be considered as the possible site of Antipas’ ancient capital (perhaps Livias extanded all the way from Tall el-Hammam to Tall Rama).      

The Byzantine Period:  The Tall el-Hammam of the Madaba Map

The 6th century Byzantine Madaba Map shows two cities northeast of the Dead Sea whose inscriptions have been lost. Highlighting both Old and New Testament sites, it was no doubt designed as a pilgrim’s map of the Holy Land. The map represented both a visual illustration of God at work in history as well as a pilgrim’s guide to finding these Biblical sites. Presumably these two unknown sites northeast of the Dead Sea were Biblical sites as well. Scholars have suggested these two sites may have been Beth Nimrah (Nimrin) and Beth Haran (or Beth Aram; modern Tall Rami or maybe nearby Iktanu) as cities in the Jordan Valley that were inherited by the tribe of Gad (Nu 32:36; Jo 13:27). Both Biblical names can be seen reflected in the modern Arabic names, and since they were Biblical sites, both would be appropriate for the pilgrim’s map. But both sites hardly qualify as famous in Biblical history.

There is another intriguing possibility. Since the Madaba Map mentions both the city of Zoar (Balak…Zoora) as well as Lot’s cave (“the sanctuary of holy Lot”), it is not unreasonable to suggest the map would also represent the two most famous cities of the plain in the Lot story – Sodom and Gomorrah. Maybe the two unnamed cities northeast of the Dead Sea (in the kikkar of the Jordan) were originally identified on the map as none other than Sodom and Gomorrah. If that is true, and if Tall el-Hammam is ancient Sodom, it could well be one (presumably the southernmost) of those two currently unidentified cities.

Summary

In review, our site was a major city from earliest times. It may be one of the oldest cities mentioned in the Bible, in the Table of Nations (Gn 10). Maybe it was Sodom from those earliest days up to the time of Abraham, well over 2,500 years. Then, after its destruction in the Middle Bronze Age, and with no evidence of occupation for over 500 years, it may have been known as Abel Shittim (“meadow of the acacia trees”) at the time of Moses. During the Iron Age, a city was built on the upper tall, and it is a reasonable candidate to be the capital of Solomon’s twelfth administrative district, in sight of the Mount of Olives at Jerusalem, Solomon’s capital. In New Testament times, a new city arose around the base of the talls and may have been Abila or even Livias (Julias), the capital of Perea. Finally, our site may be one of the unnamed sites on the Madaba Map.

Whatever our excavations and research may eventually tell us3, there is no question that Tall el-Hammam was an important site throughout the Biblical period. During each period of history, it stood as a quiet witness to some of the Bible’s greatest people and events. 

Recommended Resources for Further Study

     
Bible and Spade
CD-ROM
Archaeology and
the Old Testament

Footnotes:

1  Recent new spellings of all sites in Jordan now correspond to the Arabic spellings of the written names, not the Arabic pronunciations of the spoken names. The Arabic word for an ancient city mound, tell, is thus now written tall, but is still pronounced the same.

2  I have stayed in tents while excavating a site. The headquarters for our dig seasons has at Tall el-Hammam been the five-star Movenpick Resort and Spa Dead Sea. From our hotel on the Dead Sea’s eastern shore, we have a great view of the Israeli shoreline and the Judean mountains as well. When an unusual snow storm hit the region last year, producing no snow down in the Jordan Valley where we stayed and worked, we could see snow on Herod’s fortress of Herodian and the hills around Jerusalem. Does this sound like a sales pitch? Probably, but it is another of the nice things about excavating at Tall el-Hammam. 

3 For recent reports of results from excavations at Tall el-Hammam, see David Graves and Scott Stripling, Identification of Tall el-Hammam on the Madaba Map Bible and Spade 20.2: 35-45; Steve Collins, Sodom: The Discovery of a Lost City Bible and Spade 20.3: 70-77.

All photos credited to ABR photographer Mike Luddeni, except where indicated.

 

Please help ABR continue to post these free articles by making a donation of any size today. Donate

 

Comments Comment RSS

1/23/2009 2:09 AM #

I am surprised that ABR would print something that is a direct contradiction to the Bible and Dr. Wood's own identification of the location of Sodom.  The above theory is not consistant with the Biblical record nor is it even close to what Jesus said about the two cities so now people have to choose; 1. listen to Jesus and the Bible or 2. listen to human 'scholars'.

The sad fact is most people will choose the latter inspite of the interpretational errors made by the supporters of the above location and the limiting of  the passages of scriptures that can be used to decide on the cities location.  This manipulation is very wrong .

dr. david tee - 1/23/2009 2:09:59 AM

1/23/2009 8:00 PM #

The site sounds very interesting in that it has occupational layers from multiple periods. However, there are many assumptions made in regards to identification, and no solid evidence. As far as I can tell from everything I have read on Tall el-Hammam, there is no archaeological evidence indicating it as Sodom, Abel Shittim, or a city in Solomon's kingdom. Everything is merely conjecture based on some extremely loose fitting data.

TMR - 1/23/2009 8:00:08 PM

1/30/2009 2:52 AM #

TMR said--'The site sounds very interesting in that it has occupational layers from multiple periods'--

i was talking with dr. graves one day about this site and he mentioned that there was 10th century artifacts etc. since i was in another debate about that time period i asked him about those discoveries.  he and the other archaeologists never said a word, they kept trying to convince themselves & others that they had found sodom.

they hold to a temporary destruction yet when you show them the scripture that the 5 cities were permenantly destroyed, they would ignore them and continue hyping their claim.  sad.

dr. david t. - 1/30/2009 2:52:09 AM

7/4/2009 6:22 AM #

Mr. Thiessen (Archie):

Where is your evidence? What are your credentials? I know of your strong disagreement with the Northern Theory, but you do not offer anything in the way of evidence with which to debate the issue properly. Have you been in the area? Have you been involved in the dig?

The mention of 10th century B.C. artifacts by Dr. Graves in no way detracts from their theories about the site. This was mentioned freely by those involved including Dr. Collins himself. Further, they are in no way obligated to divulge any finds prior to proper analysis and publication, etc. Of course, if you were a real archaeologist you would know this.

EH - 7/4/2009 6:22:06 AM

8/8/2009 12:54 AM #

I must tell you that before I participated in the excavation of Tall el Hammam, I had no preconceived ideas about it.  Yet, having dug this site for the whole of season IV, there are some truths which appear evident.  From the vantagepoint of the west, looking down toward the east, the Kikkar, the circular Jordan disk, the site of Bethel and Ai is a geographic anchor.  

Gen. 13:3-4, 10, 12 states: "From the Negev he (Abram) went from place to place until he came to Bethel, to the place between Bethel and Ai where his tent had been earlier...Lot looked up and saw that the whole plain of the Jordan was well watered...So Lot chose for himself the whole plain of the Jordan and set out toward the east...Abram lived in the land of Canaan, while Lot lived among the cities of the plain and pitched his tents near Sodom."    

It simply does not take a biblical scholar to look at a map, find Bethel and Ai, then move eastward.  Where does that lead us?  The Jordan plain, or the circular Jordan disk.  It is also interesting that before Dr. Collins and his team began to research the Tall el Hammam project, Jordanian geographers also identified Tall el Hammam as the ancient site of Sodom, in a book written in the 1970's.

What do you guys need?  A roadsign that says, "Welcome to Sodom"?  "You are now entering Sodom"?  Welcome to Sodom, but PLEASE do not stay awhile!  

You are right in one sense.  We should not follow the traditions of man, but follow God.  The truth is written plainly in his word.  

ScottGH - 8/8/2009 12:54:22 AM

8/29/2009 1:00 AM #

Indeed, this site fits the Bible's described location of Sodom to perfection (East, not South like current belief).  The Bible says Sodom was visible from Bethel Ai.  The south location is not visible at all from there.  This fact alone crushes the south location.  

References to permanent destruction are from poetical/metaphorical sections of prophecy.  Critics commit the classic rookie mistake of interpreting these woodenly literal.  Hermeneutics 101 -- they should know better.

Matthew Hull - 8/29/2009 1:00:46 AM

2/8/2010 12:38 PM #

"The working hypothesis of the Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project is that our site is the best candidate for the Biblical city of Sodom."

Actually, that is just not true. I have read the final reports on tell-Hamman and there is not one shred of evidence to support that claim. All the actual evidence resies in the southern location.

"The Bible says Sodom was visible from Bethel Ai. "

This is also not true but we have come to expect this kind of comment from the NorthernLocation supporters. Over at the BAS forum, tell-Hamman has repeatedly been shown to be a false location for Sodom and that all the northern supporters have is nothing.

dr. david t. - 2/8/2010 12:38:18 PM

1/19/2012 2:24 PM #

While the area may fit the biblical description today, we don't know how massive the destruction was and what the entire area looked like before this destruction.  Sodom may have been vaporized.  One thing, it seems to me, that we should find at the site (of a true Sodom) are sulfur balls or sulfur and or burnt stuff and ash (and lots of it). Do we find that here?  There is the very likely possibility that the sounding cities of the destruction (like this dig) left the area out of sheer terror, after the cataclysmic event and those cities fell into ruin for quite some time before people began to inhabit them again. There are a lot of possibilities. Dr David T's quote of scripture "5 cities were permenantly destroyed" does not, it seems to me, prove anything.  The cities were permanently destroyed but that does not necessarily mean that many years later other cites with different names were not built in the same area or maybe even on top.  Lastly, I think there is always the possibility that the cataclysm was so severe there is no distinguishable remains Sodom and Gommorah or cities of the plains. We could be looking for something that no longer exits, at all.  Yet, I do think the search worthwhile.  

Mark Metternich - 1/19/2012 2:24:38 PM

Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

Jesus spent much time on and around the Sea of Galilee with His fishermen-disciples. These disciples,...
For many years, Jericho has been a "problem" in Biblical archaeology since scholars claimed that there...
For many years, Jericho has been a "problem" in Biblical archaeology since scholars claimed that there...
Psalm 119 is an anonymous Psalm which stands alone between two separate groupings of chapters. After...
Associates for Biblical Research
  • PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
  • Phone: +1 717-859-3443 | Fax: +1 717-859-3393
  • Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008
Friend ABR on Facebook.com Join us on Twitter Join us on Twitter