The Number of Israelites in the Exodus

Share/recommend this article:

Excerpt Recently, ABR received the following question about the number of Israelites that left Egypt in the Exodus. Dr. Bryant Wood replies... Continue reading

Explore
Related Articles
Support
Like this artice?

Our Ministry relies on the generosity of people like you. Every small donation helps us develop and publish great articles.

Please support ABR!

Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover & PayPal

Recently, ABR received the following question about the number of Israelites that left Egypt in the Exodus. Dr. Bryant Wood replies. 

Dear ABR,

In several places, the Bible seems to suggest that the Israelites involved in the Exodus and Conquest numbered more than two million people (e.g., Ex. 12:37; Num. 1: 46; Num. 26: 51).

This figure seems extraordinarily large and skeptics often cite it as proof of the biblical account's inaccuracy. I know that various solutions have been offered, by James Hoffmeier amongst others, but there appears to be insurmountable difficulties with taking the texts at anything other than face value.

Is there archaeological evidence that the Promised Land received such a large influx of people during the period under discussion?

I would appreciate any perspective you might give me on this problem.

Thank you for the question: “Is there archaeological evidence that the Promised Land received such a large influx of people during the period under discussion?”

The number of Israelites who left Egypt at the time of the Exodus is a vexed problem.  It is possible, however, to make a rough estimate.  Following the Conquest, 1406–1400 B.C., in the subsequent Late Bronze II period (14th and 13th centuries), the urban population in the highlands where the Israelites settled remained approximately the same as it was prior to the Conquest (Gonen 1984: Table 4).  Based on highland burials, however, which includes both urbanites and non-urbanites, the population seems to have increased from the pre-Conquest period to the post-Conquest period (Gonen 1992: Table 5).  The overall population is difficult to access.  We do not have estimates for the Late Bronze I and II periods, but an estimate of the highland population for the previous Middle Bronze II period is ca. 65,000 (Broshi and Gophna 1986: Tables 1, 2, 6, 7,10, 11).  Another possible way to estimate the number of Israelites who left Egypt is by means of the number of captives the Egyptians acquired in Canaan four years after the Exodus, which amounted to ca. 100,000 (Wood 2008:105–106).

At the heart of the issue is the meaning of the Hebrew word eleph.  It is usually translated “thousand,” but has a complex semantic history.  The word is etymologically connected with “head of cattle,” like the letter aleph, implying that the term was originally applied to the village or population unit in a pastoral-agricultural society.  From that it came to mean the quota supplied by one village or “clan” (Hebrew Mišpāḥā ) for the military muster (Malamat 1967: 135).  Originally the contingent was quite small, five to fourteen men in the quota lists of Numbers 1 and 26, as shown by Mendenhall (1958).  Finally the word became a technical term for a military unit of considerable size, which together with the use of the same word for the number 1,000 has tended to obscure its broader semantic range.  See also Humphreys 1998 and 2000, and Hoffmeier 2005: 153–59.

I hope this helps.

Sincerely yours,

Bryant G. Wood

Editorial note: It should be emphasized that the number of elephs recorded in the Bible that departed from Egypt is without error and infallible. The issue is not whether the Bible is wrong. The issue is determining what the original Hebrew text means and translating those figures into English in a way that most accurately reflects the original meaning.

 

Recommended Resources for Further Study

     
Bible and Spade
CD-ROM

100 Reasons to
Trust OT History

Giving
the Sense

  
References:


Broshi, Magen, and Gophna, Ram

1986  Middle Bronze Age II Palestine: Its Settlements and Population.  Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 261: 73–95.

Gonen, Rivka
1984  Urban Canaan in the Late Bronze Period.  Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 253: 61–73
1992  Burial Patterns and Cultural Diversity in Late Bronze Age Canaan.  Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.

Hoffmeier, James K.

2005  Ancient Israel in Sinai (New York: Oxford University).

Humphreys, Colin J.
1998  The Number of People in the Exodus from Egypt: Decoding the Very Large Numbers in Numbers I and XXVI.  Vetus Testamentum 48: 196–213.
2000  The Numbers in the Exodus from Egypt: A Further Appraisal. Vetus Testamentum 50: 323–28.

Malamat, Abraham
1967  Aspects of Tribal Societies in Mari and Israel.  In XVe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale: La Civilsation de Mari.  Les Congrès et Colloques de l’Université de Liège. 42.

Mendenhall, George E.
1958 The Census Lists of Numbers 1 and 26.  Journal of Biblical Literature 77: 52–66.

Wood, Bryant G.
2008  Recent Research on the Date and Setting of the Exodus.  Bible and Spade 21: 97–108.

 

Comments Comment RSS

1/5/2010 1:23 PM #

If it is true that the number of elephs is without error, then if we go with Mendelhall's suggestion of eleph being squads or sections, then this would contradict the 603, 550 in Numbers 1 or similar numbers elsewhere.  If the numbers that appear before the word eleph are sections or squads then the math would not add up to 603,550, it would be 596 sections and 5550 men

jeff martin - 1/5/2010 1:23:45 PM

3/23/2011 9:59 AM #

I also did the maths in Numbers 1 & 26 and agree with Jeff's comments.  

The census numbers give not only the number of each tribe but also the total number of the whole lot (Levi specifically excluded) so there appears to be very little room for any other interpretation other than a total number of circa 600,000 thousand adult males leaving Egypt and entering the land.  This suggests a total population figure close to 2 million which is only just over a quarter of the current population of Israel but a huge number for those days going on other historical precedents.

I wander if there has been any further research on this point since Jeff's last post?

jonathan rowland - 3/23/2011 9:59:21 AM

5/24/2011 8:35 PM #

The total numbers in Numbers 1:46, etc. also use the Hebrew word "eleph," so there is no problem that way.  The issue remains, what is an "eleph."  

A Canadian mathematician, John Byl, has an essay posted on the net which discusses the issue and includes bibliographic information for further research.

www.reformation.edu/.../15-numbers-numbers.htm

Ralph Allan Smith - 5/24/2011 8:35:02 PM

9/17/2012 4:24 PM #

Mr. Smith is quite correct in his post from 5/24/2011. The Numbers narrative also uses the term "'eleph", and thus, using the large numbers in the English translations of Numbers chapter one to say that the numbers do not match is circular reasoning.

There is certainly much more research that needs to be done on the subject. There are some unresolved difficulties, but they remain, as other Bible difficulties, unresolved. The argument that the Bible is in error because the problem is unresolved has been made ad infinitum, and is based on man-centered, autonomous reasoning as the ultimate presupposition.

ABR hopes to conduct further research into this area in the future.

Blessings,

Henry Smith
ABR Director of Development

ABR - 9/17/2012 4:24:30 PM

Add comment



biuquote
Loading



Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

The Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthian believers to imitate (follow) him as he followed the Lord Jesus...
When the apostle Paul penned the epistle to the Ephesians in AD 62, Aquila and Priscilla were back in...
"Evidence for the Exodus from Egypt: The Sudden Abandonment of Biblical Rameses during the Reign of the...
Dear Friends, In just a few short weeks Associates for Biblical Research will be wrapping up its 2012-2013...
Associates for Biblical Research
  • PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
  • Phone: +1 717-859-3443 | Fax: +1 717-859-3393
  • Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008
Friend ABR on Facebook.com Join us on Twitter Join us on Twitter