Who Framed Jesus? Putting the Recent Discovery Channel Special in Perspective

Share/recommend this article:

Excerpt In March of this year we were treated to yet another edition of information media’s relentless infatuation with reinterpreting and redefining the Bible with its insufferable post-modern spin. The Discovery Channel’s, Who Framed Jesus? was released just in time to throw a wet blanket on anyone who might actually believe the Bible’s account of the events leading up to Jesus’ crucifixion. Paraded before us was the predictable mixed bag of scholars and pseudo-scholars, who, in the typical fashion of those who have rejected the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible, offered their mush-minded opinions of what must have “really” been the cause of Jesus’ supposed “framing”... Continue reading

Explore
Related Articles
Support
Like this artice?

Our Ministry relies on the generosity of people like you. Every small donation helps us develop and publish great articles.

Please support ABR!

Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover & PayPal

In March of this year we were treated to yet another edition of information media’s relentless infatuation with reinterpreting and redefining the Bible with its insufferable post-modern spin. The Discovery Channel’s Who Framed Jesus? was released just in time to throw a wet blanket on anyone who might actually believe the Bible’s account of the events leading up to Jesus’ crucifixion. Paraded before us was the predictable mixed bag of scholars and pseudo-scholars, who, in the fashion typical of those who have rejected the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible, offered their mush-minded opinions of what must have “really” been the cause of Jesus’ supposed “framing.” Forgive my dripping disdain for such academic arrogance. 

The irony of using the word “discovery” with such meandering nonsense makes us wonder how any true conclusions can be drawn from any ancient documents. As if our conclusions could be somehow arrived at by some sort of scholarly free-for-all, group-think process. But such is the reality once we reject the Bible as an inspired and inerrant document, given to us as the very oracles of God. Mind you, I am not minimizing the importance of research and the healthy process of uncovering facts and information that elucidate the text of Scripture. But human reason, fallen and autonomous reason, unaided by the Holy Spirit, and confident of its own ability to discover truth, will always end up in this place of judging Scripture and not being judged by it. Jesus said, “Without me, you can do nothing” (John 15:5b). These scholars would do well to heed those words. 

The primary thrust of this two-hour spectacle of skepticism was an effort to zero in on who might have framed Jesus. The speculation that was offered up as potential history served as a kind of structure for the program…a “top ten” list of possible villains, as it were: 

• Judas,
• Pilate,
• disgruntled religious leaders in Jerusalem,
• Caiaphas as head of the priestly dynasty,
• the Pharisees,
• the Romans,
• the Sadducees,
• disgruntled disciples,
• Herod Antipas,
• and the coup de grace…Jesus Himself.

The Scripture, of course, clearly answers this question, even though our friends at Discovery Channel found it necessary to pick apart the uniformity of the biblical account with the “assured doubts” of an esteemed team of skeptics. Some of the cast included: Bart D. Erhman, PhD. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Paula Fredriksen, PhD. Boston University; Obery M. Hendricks, PhD. New York Theological Seminary; James H. Charlesworth, Princeton Theological Seminary (these first four scholars were all trained at Princeton University…so we are not surprised at the prejudiced approach they take to Scripture); Yisca Harani, a Tel Aviv-based historian of Christian pilgrimage; and a few others. Dr. Craig A. Evans was a notable and refreshing exception, and was a voice crying in the wilderness amongst this cast of skeptics. Such an unnecessary and ineffectual approach was properly mocked by conservative blogger Jonah Goldberg in a creative piece in National Review Online, posted on March 15, 2010. Under the framework of tweeting on Twitter, we read: “I'm pretty much speechless. I was unaware the case was open. That said, good luck getting the Procurator of Judæa to prosecute. Guy's got a serious conflict of interest.”

Goldberg continues:

Based on my knowledge of cable tv, I hypothesize the new suspects are:

1. Freemasons
2. Ghosts
3. Bigfoot
4. Midgets or dwarfs (TLC only)
5. Nostradamus
6. Hitler
7. A bridezilla
8. Flava Flav or Bret Michaels
9. The Real Housewives of Galilee
10. Some shirtless guy on Cops.1

I’m glad I’m not the only one who found much of this long-winded discussion quite pointless. However, the implications of such rampant skepticism contained in programs like this are actually quite important, as they are a part of an unending process of biblical criticism that harms the faith of those who are not well grounded. I personally received numerous questions from those who saw it - especially from those who are young in the faith - and they were confused by what they saw and heard.

The program asserted that the Bible was wrong in numerous ways, but I’d like to dissect two of those efforts here. First, it has become a favorite approach of liberals and skeptics to simply declare that someone, some place, or some thing did not exist, even though it is clearly spoken of in the Bible. In this academically reckless TV special there were numerous examples of this. In order to dismiss Judas as the betrayer (or framer, to use the program’s term), it is postulated that not only was the account of the 30 pieces of silver used as bribe money fictitious, but that Judas himself was created by the gospel writers for their purpose. James Charlesworth of Princeton University asserted that the character Judas was so contrived that he may not have been real…instead he may have been used as a literary device. Later it is suggested that the accounts of Jesus’ cleansing of the Temple either didn’t occur at all, or else the gospel writers embellished the accounts. By placing the writing of all the gospels after the destruction of the Temple, certain scholars suggest that the moneychangers were made up by the gospel writers to symbolize the destruction of the Temple. When it comes to the trial of Jesus, Erhman says that when you place the gospel accounts together it is jumble of confusion2…and Charlesworth blatantly states that the trial never took place. Over and over again these scholars simply play fast and loose with the biblical text, guided only by their skeptical presuppositions and their personal opinions of what they think happened. Anchored to a foundation of sand, these academics ironically sound like the very jumble of confusion they accuse portions of the Bible to be. 

A second way in which the skeptics in Who Framed Jesus? play with the text and meaning of Scripture is to play the role of what I like to call “literary shrinks,” claiming to know what the psychological intentions of the writers were behind their actual words. The effect of such literary psychoanalysis makes the gospel writers appear as liars, controlled only by ambition, politics, and their own distorted and narrow view of Jesus and their culture, making the New Testament a concoction of propaganda and misinformation. 

A couple of examples of this will suffice. The program’s narrator was careful to point out that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John had to make a conscious choice in their writings between support for the Jews or support for the Romans…indicating that one of their primary motives in writing was political. Such analysis only reveals the bias of the shrinks, and says nothing about the text of the New Testament. The one very clear pulse that comes through the text of the New Testament, and especially through the gospels, is that Jesus Christ came to die and rise again to transform the hearts of mankind and NOT to establish a political movement. It was not to be an earthly kingdom, but a kingdom of the heart. This reality courses through the pages of the New Testament, and one only needs to be reminded of Jesus’ statement in Matthew 22:21, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”

Another example of this same sort of this sort of psychological analysis is seen in the way these various liberal scholars attempt to explain the gospel writers’ view of Pontius Pilate. Instead of seeing how the Holy Spirit provides us with a tapestry of views or perspectives from the individual gospel writers, they instead read into the text all sorts of political and personal biases so that each writer progressively softens their views of Pilate…and so that John (as the last gospel writer) ends up making him a lackey with little or no culpability in the death of Jesus.

Such analyses are based on a belief that God did not inspire the writing of Scripture and that these scholars are capable of an unbiased process of reasoning that will bring us to a clearer understanding “of what really happened.” That is a joke. The one very clear impression one gets from such distorted analytical processes is that we are left with absolutely no understanding of anything in the text, since any and every word, sentence, and idea is left to the whims and opinions of the “experts” in the hallowed halls of liberal theological academia, some 1900 years after the fact. 

Who framed Jesus? There indeed are many individuals and groups that conspired to have Jesus arrested, leading to His scourging and death. But the Scripture is CLEAR…Judas betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver, and his act of betrayal became the greatest betrayal in all of history. 

God declared that He has spoken in Scripture. You either come to the Bible believing that God inscripturated His word or He did not. If you believe autonomous Human Reason over the Divine Revelation of Scripture, you will be left confused and will never be able to come to the knowledge of the truth. By becoming the Bible’s judges they become white-washed tombs full of dead men's bones, since they cloak themselves with Pharisaic authority in the name of science and reason. 

May God grant us all repentance for our unbelieving hearts, and may we be brought to a healthy and proper submission to Jesus Christ and to the Word of God inspired.

Footnotes:

1. Jonah Goldberg: "Who Framed Jesus?" National Review Online, posted March 15, 2010. http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWFhNDMxOWQzYzkxNjUxN2ZlNjYyMmFlMjFkNzJmYTc=
(accessed May 14, 2010)

2. For a refutation of the so-called "jumble of confusion," see: Blomberg, Craig. The Historical Reliability of the Gospels (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2007). And: Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman's Publishing, 2006).

 

Comments Comment RSS

5/15/2010 12:44 AM #

My question is: why do christian scholars not put together their own 2 hour show and present the truth instead of hiding on their websites complaining about what the secular world produces?

Objectivity demands that both sides of the issue need to be aired and that people get to make up their own minds.(remember the secular world is NOT objective). Instead of letting the secular world use t.v. to brainwash the world, it is time for true christians to present the truth in a quality  produced documentary which shows the real story-- the truth.

Jesus said that they cannot do anything against the truth so christians need to stand up and start stepping out and present their side, while demanding real evidence from those like Bart Ehrman so they can prove their side instead of letting them get away with innuendo, conjecture and hypothesis.

I have read Erhman's and other secular scholar's books and they do not have any evidence to support their side. Time to expose thesepeople for who they really are and make an impact for God.

dr. david t. - 5/15/2010 12:44:24 AM

5/15/2010 12:53 AM #

I'm actually surprised you responded to that show.  The arguments that you quoted from the show seemed silly at best, with little to no evidence to back them up.  It's sad that people actually believe this stuff.  I guess when people want to reject absolute truth, they'll accept anything that opposes it; regardless of its complete lack of validity.

I'll admit I'm on sinus medication, so i'm a little out of it, but I'm still slightly confused what Jesus was supposedly "framed" for?  He repeatedly admitted to the charges of claiming deity.  In the case of Judas, I wouldn't call what he did as "framing" anyone?  Betrayal would be a more accurate word, but I'm lost on the whole "framed" question.  I guess it doesn't matter though, it seems to be an episode to make those who don't want to believe, feel ok that they don't believe.

Good article though!

Joel Gabriele - 5/15/2010 12:53:35 AM

5/15/2010 12:56 AM #

"My question is: why do christian scholars not put together their own 2 hour show and present the truth instead of hiding on their websites complaining about what the secular world produces?"

Good question, but I'd be curious if any major station would even show it.  Discovery is purely secular and seems to show anything against the claims of Christianity.  I agree that we should use media, but I'm wondering if people have tried, only to have it put on PBS to have it ignored by the majority of the world.  Too bad a mainstream station wouldn't care what people thought and aired something like that.

Joel Gabriele - 5/15/2010 12:56:00 AM

5/15/2010 2:17 AM #

The above poster forgets that the secular world is not the only section of the human population which owns t.v. stations.  he also forgets that if the secular networks think they can make money, they will air the show.

Though the argument for true objectivity can be compelling.

dr. david t. - 5/15/2010 2:17:07 AM

5/15/2010 2:18 AM #

Christians need to stop defeating themselves and look to God to provide the opportunities.

dr. david t. - 5/15/2010 2:18:07 AM

5/15/2010 3:36 AM #

I didn't forget, I believe I mentioned a likely channel it would end up on would be PBS.  
In your first post you said "My question is: why do christian scholars not put together their own 2 hour show and present the truth instead of hiding on their websites complaining about what the secular world produces? "

Anyone who has cable or satellite knows that Christian broadcasts are made which promote Christian science, etc.  Since we should both know this fact, then it would go to suggest you're saying Christians should be on something more mainstream.  I apologize, I should have first asked if you knew that there were, in fact, Christian broadcasts.  There are.  Now that you know that, we can move on to who's the majority watching them, Christians.  Even still, they aren't mainstream.  Going further you said:

"Objectivity demands that both sides of the issue need to be aired and that people get to make up their own minds."

Since we know that you can't force a station to air anything, then we're back to the fact that secular stations, which are more mainstream, don't generally air Christian shows.

Next you said: "he also forgets that if the secular networks think they can make money, they will air the show."

Then why hasn't it happened?

Next you said: "Christians need to stop defeating themselves and look to God to provide the opportunities."

Have you looked to God to provide an opportunity to get on mainstream television with a Christian broadcast?

Joel Gabriele - 5/15/2010 3:36:22 AM

5/15/2010 9:08 AM #

The only thing i will say here is 'why do you limit God so much?' There was a man many years ago who, got behind a church bus and the back of it said 'follow me to ________ church. he did and he became a christian that day.

You follow God's leading not vice versa and these 'problems' you keep raising will disappear

dr. david t. - 5/15/2010 9:08:06 AM

5/15/2010 5:13 PM #

I didn't raise any problems and I'm not limiting God?  I asked a question you didn't answer.  I'll ask it again:

Have you looked to God to provide an opportunity to get on mainstream television with a Christian broadcast?

Joel Gabriele - 5/15/2010 5:13:09 PM

5/16/2010 3:07 AM #

One needs to add that ABR has been producing DVDs for general sale to help counteract the media productions of the secular world but it is no hard thing to contact the networks and producers of such documenteries, like the one discussed in the above article, and ask for equal time. (As long as the product is done honestly).

dr. david t. - 5/16/2010 3:07:12 AM

5/16/2010 11:14 PM #

I tried to get a copy of the program so i could view it but the network doesn't ship to this country. did anyone copy it and who doesn't feel bad about sharing it over pando?

dr. david t. - 5/16/2010 11:14:10 PM

5/17/2010 3:18 AM #

     Just a reminder that, undoubtedly, the conclusions of at least some of the scholars on "Who framed Jesus" represent only the radical fringe of Jesus Seminar scholarship. (Why, even J. D. Crossan admits the Cleansing of the Temple happened and played a very important role in the the trial of Jesus! And nobody but the extreme edge of the radical fringe seriously believes that episode represents the destruction of the temple! Mark 13 was, in all probability, written in 67AD, just after the death of Peter and Paul, and by no means after the Fall of Jerusalem!).

Why does Discovery do it and why won't a Christian 2-hour show work? The public does not buy fact, but intrigue. Especially the public to which all conclusions of NT scholarship they don't yet know of are fascinating. Why else would Discovery allow Simcha Jacobovici to be on their program even for one second?

E. Harding - 5/17/2010 3:18:23 AM

5/18/2010 9:04 PM #

"Christ came to die and rise again to transform the hearts of mankind and NOT to establish a political movement. It was not to be an earthly kingdom, but a kingdom of the heart"

You might need to clarify this statement. Because Christ did offer the Kingdom, but the Jews rejected it. This Kingdom IS a literal Kingdom and will be establised at the second advent. I't will last for a 1000 years with the Lion of the house of Juda as its head, Jesus Christ.

Bill A - 5/18/2010 9:04:55 PM

5/18/2010 11:57 PM #

'Why does Discovery do it and why won't a Christian 2-hour show work? The public does not buy fact, but intrigue'

that should not matter, we believers are not to do as the people want but as God wants and we do not know who will accept a good, honest christian documentary that deals with the facts without ulterior motives and seeks to be saved.

dr. david t. - 5/18/2010 11:57:28 PM

5/19/2010 7:31 PM #

I believe ABR is referring to Jesus statements The Kingdom is within and mine kingdom is not of this world should they fight.

Travis - 5/19/2010 7:31:08 PM

5/21/2010 11:01 PM #

Discovery Channel has never to my knowledge produced a show titled "Who Framed Mohamed?"  Why no expansion of the series?  I can only see three reasons.

o The producers want 'use' the Christians of this country by taking non-traditional interpretation and piquing people's curiosity to sell their shows.
o The producers want to push their own religious view.
o The producers want to distort the truth and cause the uninformed to move away from their faith.

If this was a distortion of Islam, their heads would be hunted.  Please, Discovery Channel, produce a program called "Mohamed Teaching Exploded."  Let's see what happens.

Glen N - 5/21/2010 11:01:19 PM

8/6/2010 8:17 PM #

To commenter Glen N above:

Your absolutely correct!

Amerisrael - 8/6/2010 8:17:19 PM

3/19/2013 1:27 PM #

It is sick to see that these people in the video of who framed Jesus do not believe. Lucky are the ones that believe without having seen.

jazmin membreno - 3/19/2013 1:27:57 PM

9/1/2013 10:01 AM #

It's showing right now here in Asia. It's to me (an occasional Bible reader) somewhat bordering on the detestable although not surprising at all - we're constantly bombarded by these over sensationalized 'Bible conspiracy' featurettes - looking for suspects were as there is none. My granddad is laughing at how terrible the show is.

There's so much 'sophistication', twists and turns thrown in the show on to probably the most simple and direct passages in the Bible. They've really become very desperate.

Radioman - 9/1/2013 10:01:08 AM

Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

INTRODUCTION: Something happened over 1,970 years ago that changed the course of world history. This...
On February 8, 2014, a symposium was held at Houston Baptist University in conjunction with the new archaeological...
We presently live in a culture of great skepticism and confusion. Many scholars, scientists, historians...
On February 8, 2014, a symposium was held at Houston Baptist University in conjunction with the new archaeological...
Associates for Biblical Research
  • PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
  • Phone: +1 717-859-3443 | Fax: +1 717-859-3393
  • Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008
Friend ABR on Facebook.com Join us on Twitter Join us on Twitter